New Yorkers will discover who will be their new city leader this election day, in a contest that will decide who governs and protects the country's largest city at a time when Donald Trump has threatened to send armed forces to the urban center.
In this context, New York has witnessed a race for mayor that has pitted two distinctly opposing Democratic figures against each other. The election has turned into an increasingly bitter face-off, laced with alleged racism and Islamophobia, but it is the political differences between the two main contenders that could have major implications for how the party performs in next year's midterm elections.
On the left side is the democratic socialist, the young progressive candidate whose meteoric rise and people-powered movement has attracted global notice. On the establishment side is Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor now campaigning independently – and benefiting from the backing of wealthy contributors and corporations.
As the election approaches, it is the progressive, the one-time underdog who beat his opponent in the party primary who is firmly installed as the frontrunner. The candidate, who has campaigned on a platform of economic justice and promised to halt rent increases for about 2 million city residents, has led his rival by significant margins in every poll taken in October, and it is very much the younger man's election to throw away.
Yet, the former governor, who resigned as governor in recent years amid accusations of sexual harassment, has stated clearly he will fight to the end, and not necessarily in an above-the-belt fashion. He has trashed his opponent's goals as unrealistic, and in recent days laughed as a radio host made Islamophobic remarks about the candidate, who is a Muslim. Two weeks ago, the independent was widely condemned as racist after posting an artificial intelligence video that featured a slew of racial caricatures and showed Mamdani releasing a convicts.
It's been a rather grubby conclusion to an election that could be key to the path that the party, struggling in its reaction to Trump's authoritarian grabs, takes in the coming years.
Should Mamdani wins convincingly, the establishment party leaders who have declined to support his bid will be forced to reckon with a message that has resonated with Americans' anger at inequality, soaring price rises and the political elite. It would be hard for Chuck Schumer and the House leader not to adopt at least some of the candidate's ambitious ideas about economic justice, given the newcomer has generated an excitement within the Democratic ranks perhaps not witnessed since the Vermont senator campaigned for the White House in 2016.
Conversely, if Cuomo, who had been predicted to sail to victory in the June primary, complete a surprising riches-to-rags-to-riches win, it could cement the party's current model of cautious, uninspiring opposition – a tactic that has infuriated grassroots members. A New York defeat of the progressive's optimistic platform could persuade Schumer and Jeffries that the best plan is to remain in the political center – even as polls show the current iteration of the party is widely disliked nationwide.
Residents of the city appear to favor the progressive agenda. Surveys show that Mamdani supporters are far more enthusiastic about their candidate than Cuomo backers, something that has been evident during the race. The candidate's snappy videos on digital platforms, his optimistic vision for the city and his readiness to actually venture out and meet people in the metropolis has attracted an army of over fifty thousand volunteers, many of them youth or new participants.
Yet, the former governor, in his late sixties, isn't giving up. And with the risks against him, the ex-leader has turned to negative campaigning in the final days.
Following extensive throwing basically everything at Mamdani to see what might stick, the independent has narrowed his focus on targeting the candidate personally. He has labelled Mamdani, who was of Ugandan origin to Indian parents, an “extremist”, and appeared on Fox Business for an discussion with a rightwing host, where the candidate asserted the city “will not survive” his opponent as mayor. It reached a nadir recently, when Cuomo chuckled and said “that’s another problem” after a broadcaster said the candidate would “cheer” another 9/11-style incident.
This strategy mirrors much of what Trump, who has deployed the national guard to the capital and threatened to do the same to NYC, has said about Mamdani, and perhaps that is expected. A group of billionaire New Yorkers, including some who contributed to the Republican in the 2024 election, have pumped millions into trying to elect Cuomo elected, as other influential figures have urged Curtis Sliwa to withdraw from the contest.
As far as the Cuomo camp, and his wealthy backers, are worried, it should never have come to this. When the assemblyman, one of one hundred fifty state legislators, launched his mayoral bid in last year, few had heard of him, and in reality, barely anyone even paid attention.
Cuomo, by contrast, entered smoothly into the contest in this year and became the instant favorite. He was the political heavyweight who seemingly held every edge. The quintessential political insider, he had married a Kennedy and served in a Democratic presidency. He became New York governor in 2011, seventeen years after his father, the former governor, stepped down from the same position.
Mamdani, who was voted in to the New York state assembly in 2020, does not have the same political heritage. But his commitment to providing no-cost transit and free childcare – along with the rent control promise – present a more positive vision of the future than Cuomo’s pessimistic predictions about “mayhem” and rising criminal activity, and his vow to hire more police officers.
Nevertheless, Mamdani has faced difficulties in the final phase, after video surfaced appearing to show him implying the NYPD and the IDF were connected.
“We have to make clear that when the boot of the police is on your throat, it’s been laced by the Israeli military,” Mamdani said in the clip, recorded at a DSA convention in recent years. The progressive, a longtime critic of Israel who has said the nation is engaging in atrocities in Gaza, suggested he was criticizing joint training exercises between the NYPD and Israeli forces.
As the race closes, Mamdani seems to have gained sympathy and support, however, for his reaction to his opponent's escalating attacks.
Mamdani addressed the independent's terrorism comments in an emotional video. In it, the candidate recalled how, when he first ran for state assembly, a family member advised to him that he did not have to disclose about his Muslim faith. It was a realization, Mamdani said, that many Muslim New Yorkers had been told “again and again”: “That safety could only be found in the margins of our city. That it is in those hidden spaces alone where followers of Islam could express their true selves, and that if we were to emerge from those seclusion, then it is in those shadows that we must set aside our faith.”
Addressing the behavior of Cuomo and Sliwa, who has alleged Mamd
Elara Vance is a digital marketing strategist with over 8 years of experience, specializing in SEO and content creation for tech startups.