Nicolas Cage may be the optimal selection for a audacious horror film about the biblical figure, however not for the motivations certain audiences might assume. Truthfully, Cage does not actually portray the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: his character is credited only as a craftsman. The actor is cast as a father figure in this narrative, attempting to uphold his faith while his son (acted by Noah Jupe), their now-teenage adopted son, begins to show miraculous gifts. The explanation it's hard to envision any other prominent performer taking this character is that even as the role is weighed down with numerous trials, the actor seems almost touchingly convinced that the murky, bleak feature is a valuable project.
Nicolas Cage was using his time more selectively recently. He continues to makes more films than the majority of average viewers could possibly view — for instance, were you informed that he has filmed a trio of different frontier films in the past three years? — yet he also mixes in prestige A24/Neon gigs like one recent hit, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film seems like one of those, because it’s borderline horror, potentially provocative, and approaches a exaggerated concept quite seriously.
Sadly, writer-director the director fails to repay that serious attention. The Carpenter’s Son begins with a compellingly nomadic context, positioned as inspired by an unknown scripture about Christ’s childhood. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their son travel from place to place, anxious of doctrinal intolerance or suspicion about The Boy’s strange powers. “Trouble pursues us,” Cage mournfully notes. This persists when sinister entities attack the family where they currently live, beginning on that traditional religious challenge for the son.
At times, the movie echoes an demonic possession-type horror film, though not one of the lead characters are explicitly taken over. Instead, they are progressively isolated from each other, when these entities influence a resident female (Isla Johnston, named “The Stranger”) that The Boy connects to, and presents everyone disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter especially fights with his role in this story, sometimes berating the son he doesn't completely grasp.
The subject matter is likely to invite debate, and Nathan approaches it with much care — too much, maybe. The idea of a teenage boy confronted with his destined offering and lured by unknown powers is indeed frightening, but the filmmaker may be wary of appearing sensational and keen to indicate his intentions, thus he frequently retreats into gloomily threatening filming. Characters continually reflect — the singer-actress, who demonstrated notable talent in the 2024 Crow remake, surprisingly — yields her acting to her religious attire, sometimes broken up by some disturbing frightening scenes.
Simultaneously, Cage dabbles in exactly the kind of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles may desire. An instance (featured) in promotional material in which Cage erupts and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” When this sort of theatrical release is a component of your religious scary film, perhaps a more openly absurd method would be more effective of Cage’s willingness to go over the top when necessary. On the other hand, the film more closely resembles the weaker direct-to-video films Cage made through much of the last decade — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and often contain some select memorable scenes, but in the end seem like, frankly, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.
Truthfully, several of these, although simpler, were easier to view in general. This is when I need to disregard my own dogma, not faith-based but work-oriented: Previously, a beloved editor urged me to banish words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my analytical lexicon. Such terms convey little but a personal and vaguely expressed lack of patience, avoiding the job of vibrantly communicating the intellectual and feeling of seeing an individual production. It’s difficult to convey tedium without sounding boring oneself. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Explain further,” in other words.
However, I admit, I was bored throughout the film. On the positive side, it’s a religious style of boredom, not for The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but since it takes a type of obedient endurance to view it. At some point soon after starting, the movie settles into a monotonous pattern of simmering distress, and does not
Elara Vance is a digital marketing strategist with over 8 years of experience, specializing in SEO and content creation for tech startups.